| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Combined divisions - these are NOT official results. |
|
Oct. 7th |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Match Date: 10/7/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stage No: |
1 |
|
Distance Match |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place |
Name |
|
|
|
|
No. |
Class |
Division |
Points |
Penalties |
|
Time |
Hit Factor |
Stage Pts |
|
Stage % |
1 |
Harrington, Mitch |
1 |
B |
Open |
|
73 |
|
0 |
|
12.38 |
5.8966 |
80.0000 |
|
100.00% |
2 |
Nixon, Anthony |
2 |
B |
Single Stack |
|
64 |
|
10 |
|
17.41 |
3.1017 |
42.0812 |
|
52.60% |
3 |
Doll, Ryan |
3 |
U |
Single Stack |
|
67 |
|
20 |
|
23.24 |
2.0224 |
27.4382 |
|
34.30% |
4 |
Acridge, Dan |
4 |
B |
Limited |
|
40 |
|
20 |
|
17.62 |
1.1351 |
15.4001 |
|
19.25% |
5 |
Mountford, Danel |
5 |
U |
Production |
|
38 |
|
50 |
|
20.53 |
0 |
.0000 |
|
0.00% |
Number of Competitors: |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stage No: |
2 |
|
Stage 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place |
Name |
|
|
|
|
No. |
Class |
Division |
Points |
Penalties |
|
Time |
Hit Factor |
Stage Pts |
|
Stage % |
1 |
Harrington, Mitch |
1 |
B |
Open |
|
82 |
|
0 |
|
12.53 |
6.5443 |
90.0000 |
|
100.00% |
2 |
Acridge, Dan |
4 |
B |
Limited |
|
82 |
|
0 |
|
14.89 |
5.5071 |
75.7360 |
|
84.15% |
3 |
Nixon, Anthony |
2 |
B |
Single Stack |
|
82 |
|
0 |
|
15.57 |
5.2665 |
72.4272 |
|
80.47% |
4 |
Mountford, Danel |
5 |
U |
Production |
|
68 |
|
0 |
|
19.25 |
3.5325 |
48.5804 |
|
53.98% |
5 |
Doll, Ryan |
3 |
U |
Single Stack |
|
74 |
|
10 |
|
19.92 |
3.2129 |
44.1852 |
|
49.09% |
Number of Competitors: |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stage No: |
3 |
|
Stage 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place |
Name |
|
|
|
|
No. |
Class |
Division |
Points |
Penalties |
|
Time |
Hit Factor |
Stage Pts |
|
Stage % |
1 |
Harrington, Mitch |
1 |
B |
Open |
|
81 |
|
0 |
|
15.24 |
5.3150 |
90.0000 |
|
100.00% |
2 |
Acridge, Dan |
4 |
B |
Limited |
|
71 |
|
10 |
|
15.66 |
3.8953 |
65.9599 |
|
73.29% |
3 |
Mountford, Danel |
5 |
U |
Production |
|
66 |
|
0 |
|
20.11 |
3.2819 |
55.5731 |
|
61.75% |
4 |
Nixon, Anthony |
2 |
B |
Single Stack |
|
67 |
|
20 |
|
18.74 |
2.5080 |
42.4685 |
|
47.19% |
5 |
Doll, Ryan |
3 |
U |
Single Stack |
|
70 |
|
10 |
|
30.27 |
1.9822 |
33.5650 |
|
37.29% |
Number of Competitors: |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stage No: |
4 |
|
Stage 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place |
Name |
|
|
|
|
No. |
Class |
Division |
Points |
Penalties |
|
Time |
Hit Factor |
Stage Pts |
|
Stage % |
1 |
Harrington, Mitch |
1 |
B |
Open |
|
83 |
|
0 |
|
11.10 |
7.4775 |
90.0000 |
|
100.00% |
2 |
Acridge, Dan |
4 |
B |
Limited |
|
83 |
|
0 |
|
12.90 |
6.4341 |
77.4415 |
|
86.05% |
3 |
Nixon, Anthony |
2 |
B |
Single Stack |
|
85 |
|
0 |
|
14.81 |
5.7394 |
69.0800 |
|
76.76% |
4 |
Mountford, Danel |
5 |
U |
Production |
|
74 |
|
0 |
|
15.76 |
4.6954 |
56.5143 |
|
62.79% |
5 |
Doll, Ryan |
3 |
U |
Single Stack |
|
86 |
|
0 |
|
24.74 |
3.4762 |
41.8399 |
|
46.49% |
Number of Competitors: |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stage No: |
5 |
|
Stage 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place |
Name |
|
|
|
|
No. |
Class |
Division |
Points |
Penalties |
|
Time |
Hit Factor |
Stage Pts |
|
Stage % |
1 |
Harrington, Mitch |
1 |
B |
Open |
|
84 |
|
0 |
|
12.15 |
6.9136 |
90.0000 |
|
100.00% |
2 |
Acridge, Dan |
4 |
B |
Limited |
|
88 |
|
0 |
|
15.32 |
5.7441 |
74.7757 |
|
83.08% |
3 |
Nixon, Anthony |
2 |
B |
Single Stack |
|
76 |
|
10 |
|
16.19 |
4.0766 |
53.0684 |
|
58.96% |
4 |
Mountford, Danel |
5 |
U |
Production |
|
74 |
|
0 |
|
20.96 |
3.5305 |
45.9594 |
|
51.07% |
5 |
Doll, Ryan |
3 |
U |
Single Stack |
|
87 |
|
10 |
|
24.20 |
3.1818 |
41.4201 |
|
46.02% |
Number of Competitors: |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stage No: |
6 |
|
Strong Hand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place |
Name |
|
|
|
|
No. |
Class |
Division |
Points |
Penalties |
|
Time |
Hit Factor |
Stage Pts |
|
Stage % |
1 |
Harrington, Mitch |
1 |
B |
Open |
|
82 |
|
0 |
|
17.12 |
4.7897 |
90.0000 |
|
100.00% |
2 |
Acridge, Dan |
4 |
B |
Limited |
|
79 |
|
10 |
|
14.70 |
4.6939 |
88.1999 |
|
98.00% |
3 |
Nixon, Anthony |
2 |
B |
Single Stack |
|
80 |
|
0 |
|
24.02 |
3.3306 |
62.5830 |
|
69.54% |
4 |
Doll, Ryan |
3 |
U |
Single Stack |
|
89 |
|
0 |
|
31.73 |
2.8049 |
52.7050 |
|
58.56% |
5 |
Mountford, Danel |
5 |
U |
Production |
|
58 |
|
0 |
|
22.26 |
2.6056 |
48.9601 |
|
54.40% |
Number of Competitors: |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stage No: |
7 |
|
Left Hand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Place |
Name |
|
|
|
|
No. |
Class |
Division |
Points |
Penalties |
|
Time |
Hit Factor |
Stage Pts |
|
Stage % |
1 |
Acridge, Dan |
4 |
B |
Limited |
|
82 |
|
0 |
|
19.51 |
4.2030 |
90.0000 |
|
100.00% |
2 |
Harrington, Mitch |
1 |
B |
Open |
|
79 |
|
0 |
|
31.34 |
2.5207 |
53.9764 |
|
59.97% |
3 |
Mountford, Danel |
5 |
U |
Production |
|
64 |
|
0 |
|
27.60 |
2.3188 |
49.6531 |
|
55.17% |
4 |
Doll, Ryan |
3 |
U |
Single Stack |
|
70 |
|
0 |
|
40.39 |
1.7331 |
37.1113 |
|
41.23% |
5 |
Nixon, Anthony |
2 |
B |
Single Stack |
|
65 |
|
60 |
|
31.52 |
0.1586 |
3.3961 |
|
3.77% |
Number of Competitors: |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Printed: |
|
10/14/11 9:34 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|